telecine to disk vs. telecine to digibeta??

topic posted Fri, April 25, 2008 - 9:40 PM by  robtronic
hey all -- i’m about to edit a 16mm music video on finalcut... for my final dvd and digibeta deliverables, i’m wondering what the smarter choice would be -- telecine uncompressed QT to disk, or telecine to digibeta?

in the end, would a telecine to uncompressed QT somehow yield a noticeably higher image quality than a telecine to digibeta?

and assuming i’m going to pay someone to handle the online -- would i be saving a significant amount of money pulling master footage right off the hard disk during the online edit, avoiding the cost of digitizing from a digibeta deck?

and are there any other advantages to having uncompressed masters on disk? e.g. would it give the online editor more room to maneuver (in terms of color correction and effects) than if he/she had to work off of digibeta masters?

thanks!
posted by:
robtronic
Massachusetts
  • Re: telecine to disk vs. telecine to digibeta??

    Sat, April 26, 2008 - 2:55 AM
    just remember your life of generation loss-

    if you have the space go to disk - you have to make sure your telecine house will support that- in most cases it will be easier for them to hand you a digibeta.
    then just digitize that uncompressed.